13:27, 4 марта 2026Путешествия
NFAs are cheaper to construct, but have a O(n*m) matching time, where n is the size of the input and m is the size of the state graph. NFAs are often seen as the reasonable middle ground, but i disagree and will argue that NFAs are worse than the other two. they are theoretically “linear”, but in practice they do not perform as well as DFAs (in the average case they are also much slower than backtracking). they spend the complexity in the wrong place - why would i want matching to be slow?! that’s where most of the time is spent. the problem is that m can be arbitrarily large, and putting a large constant of let’s say 1000 on top of n will make matching 1000x slower. just not acceptable for real workloads, the benchmarks speak for themselves here.，详情可参考旺商聊官方下载
，更多细节参见一键获取谷歌浏览器下载
（一）船舶所有人的受雇人或者代理人；
Credit: Joe Maldonado / Mashable，更多细节参见safew官方版本下载